Context

This work was completed as part of the AI Studio – Defense & Security vertical, where I design and evaluate AI-assisted workflows for highly regulated, review-heavy environments.

The project served as a design vehicle to explore how AI can be embedded into existing case-management workflows while preserving trust, auditability, and human accountability. The focus was on demonstrating design judgment under constraint rather than showcasing a standalone product.

My Role

Context

Product Designer (UX/UI)

I owned the UX and interaction design end to end, including:

  • Framing the problem from stakeholder conversations

  • Defining workflows and interaction patterns

  • Designing high-fidelity, system-aligned screens

  • Making judgment calls around AI behavior, review, and compliance

This work was completed as part of the AI Studio – Defense & Security vertical, where I design and evaluate AI-assisted workflows for highly regulated, review-heavy environments.

The project served as a design vehicle to explore how AI can be embedded into existing case-management workflows while preserving trust, auditability, and human accountability. The focus was on demonstrating design judgment under constraint rather than showcasing a standalone product.

Early UX exploration of explainable Ai in case management

My Role

Product Designer (UX/UI)

I owned the UX and interaction design end to end, including:

  • Framing the problem from stakeholder conversations

  • Defining workflows and interaction patterns

  • Designing high-fidelity, system-aligned screens

  • Making judgment calls around AI behavior, review, and compliance

The Challenge

The core challenge was not introducing AI.
It was integrating AI into workflows where errors are costly and oversight is mandatory.

From discussions and reviews, key tensions emerged:

  • Work is organized by cases, but information is fragmented

  • High-risk documents require careful verification

  • Review flows are sequential and time-consuming

  • AI must be explainable, traceable, and easy to challenge

These constraints shaped every design decision.

Goals

Keep the case as the primary organizing unit

  • Make AI actions explicit and user-controlled

  • Preserve human review and approval

  • Make sourcing and verification visible by default

  • Design something that could realistically live inside enterprise systems

Approach

My approach was workflow-first and constraint-aware.

I:

  • Started from how users already work, not from AI capabilities

  • Treated AI as assistive, not autonomous

  • Designed interactions that support review rather than bypass it

  • Prioritized clarity, predictability, and restraint

The result is a calm, explainable experience aligned with real operational expectations.

Key UX Decisions

  • No chat-first interface: AI actions live inside the case and are intentionally triggered

  • Provenance by default: Citations remain visible to support verification

  • Human-in-the-loop: No automatic submissions or hidden automation

  • Progressive disclosure: Advanced checks appear only when relevant

Design System & Platform Alignment

  • To keep the work grounded in reality, I designed within established enterprise constraints:

  • Used USWDS patterns to align with accessibility and federal UI expectations

  • Designed workflows that fit Microsoft Dynamics-style case management

  • Explored how the same interactions map to Fluent UI for enterprise consistency

  • This ensured the concept reflects systems people already trust and know.

What This Shows About Me

This work demonstrates that I:

  • Design AI responsibly in Defense & Security contexts

  • Translate abstract constraints into usable structure

  • Make clear tradeoffs between automation and control

  • Work comfortably within enterprise platforms and standards

  • Prioritize trust, clarity, and review over novelty

The system is the context. The value is the thinking.

Reflection

This project reinforced a principle that guides my work in regulated environments:

Good UX should reduce risk, not introduce it.

By embedding AI into familiar case workflows and established design systems, the experience supports human judgment rather than competing with it.